Updated: 30 SEP 08
This is the site of the Free Flight Mailing List [F F M L] NOCAL Postal Contest,
an event for simple, recognizable scale model airplanes. Our contest is over now, ending on April 30, 2000.

A completed NOCAL model - Art Chester's "Swee' Pea" Cleveland racer.
|
This is the second FFML NOCAL Postal contest. It runs from December 6, 1999 through April 30, 2000 [the first contest ran from December, 1997 through March of 1998]. As entrants report their flight results, you will see them posted here. The term "NOCAL" evidently reflects the thought of 'no calories', as in, 'no weight'. These models are quite small, limited to 16" wingspan, and light in weight - they can weigh as little as 2.5 grams. As you will note in the rules section, some of the models are required to weigh at least 6.2 grams [the weight of 2 pre-1974 U.S. one cent pieces -pennies] without the rubber strand motor, in order to equalize conditions. Eight events are included: 3 for indoor models (flown in a hall, gym or larger site - there are even a couple of blimp hangers available!); and 5 for outdoor models. Rules for the postal contest are listed below the results tables. The event called 'NOCAL' is defined in rules from FAC, the Flying Aces Club, a national organization intended to promote model flying.
|
| This picture shows the 'bones' of a NOCAL; in this case it's a model of the Napier-Heston Racer, built on the eve of WW II - to set a speed record of 500 MPH. Note the simple construction with a profile [flat] body and single surface wings and tail. |

| Here is David Dodge's Flapjack NOCAL from '97-98. This is a really amazing flying model of a most unusual layout for a 'flying machine'. |

| This is Niels Brendel's [Hengelo, The Netherlands] nice looking Extra 300s. It should be flying sometime in February. |

| Here's David Duganne's Piper Vagabond. |

Send flight results data, questions, comments, or pictures as .jpg files to AL @: aalmps@aol.com 480-839-8154 evenings and weekends EVENTS:INDOOR: Kit/Plan 'stock': plastic prop requiredInitially, times will be posted in the order received. When the contest ends, indoor times in all categories will be adjusted by a factor in an attempt to express times as if all flights took place under the same ceiling height. The 'factor' is a multiplier: Factor = 627 / (167 + 46Xhsqr), where 'hsqr' is the square root of the specified ceiling. Experimenting with the formula will show that a 100' ceiling rates a factor of one (1). |
| Date | Entrant's Name | Model Name/Designer | 3 Flight Total (sec.) | Ceiling Height (ft/m) | Adj. Factor | Corr. Score | Place |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23 | Danjo, Akihiro / Japan | Lacey M-10 / Danjo | 770 | 29.52 ft | 1.504 | 1157.968 | 1 |
| Dec 20 | Rash, Fred / US | White Monoplane canard pusher/ Baird-Assel | 514 | 116 ft | .947 | 486.505 | 8 |
| Jan 13 | Duganne, David / US | Piper Vagabond/ Duganne | 213.95 | 21 ft | 1.660 | 355.075 | 14 |
| Feb 24 | Rash, Fred / US | White Monoplane canard pusher/ Baird-Assel-Rash | 916 | 116 ft | .947 | 867.001 | 2 |
| Feb 27 | Tornkvist, Birgit / Sweden | Wittman Witt's V racer/ George Tornkvist | 446 | 24.5 ft | 1.589 | 708.513 | 5 |
| Mar 5 | Brendel, Niels / NL | Extra 300S / N. Brendel | 298 | 29.52 ft | 1.504 | 448.149 | 11 |
| Mar 30 | Baughman, Gary / US | Bonzo / Baughman | 553 | 34 ft | 1.441 | 796.673 | 3 |
| Mar 30 | Crawford, Dohrman / US | Waterman Gosling / Linstrum | 276 | 34 ft | 1.441 | 397.616 | 12 |
| Mar 30 | Perryman, George / US | Floyd Bean Special / Perryman | 266 | 34 ft | 1.441 | 383.210 | 13 |
| Dec 29 | Linkosalo, Tapio / FI | FW44 Stieglitz / Linkosalo | 403 | 26.7 ft | 1.549 | 624.379 | 7 |
| Mar 18 | Brendel, Gert/ NL | AT6 / G. Brendel | 235 | 29.52 ft | 1.504 | 353.406 | 15 |
| Mar 22 | Perryman, George/ GA;US | Floyd Bean Special / Perryman | 463 | 34 ft | 1.441 | 667.015 | 6 |
| Mar 22 | Stevens, Robert*/ TN;US | Tipsy Jr / Lidberg | 329 | 34 ft | 1.441 | 473.970 | 9 |
| Mar 22 | Luebbe, Brian* / TN;US | Fike / ? | 315 | 34 ft | 1.441 | 453.801 | 10 |
| Mar 22 | Andrews, Karen* / TN;US | PI-6 / ? | 177 | 34 ft | 1.441 | 254.993 | 16 |
| Mar 22 | Lavender, Tim* / TN;US | Goon / ? | 103 | 34 ft | 1.441 | 148.386 | 17 |
| Mar 22 | Trisler, Terry / KS;US | Fike / Marret | 520 | 34 ft | 1.441 | 749.132 | 4 |
| Date | Entrant's Name | Model Name / Designer | 3 Flight Total (sec.) | Ceiling Height (ft/m) | Adj. Factor | Corr. Score | Place |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan3,'98 Example | Fleming, John | Beech 'Staggerwing'/Lidberg | 449 | 22 ft | 1.638 | 735.5 | NA |
| John Fleming has sent us a picture of his electric Staggerwing Beech from the 97-98 Postal. Look closely and you can see the red LED that flashes in flight. |

| Date | Entrant's Name | Model Name / Designer | 3 Flight Total (sec.) | 4th flight (sec.) | Total Score | Place |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAR ? | Powers, Steve age 12-13 | TEAM HiMax / Bredehoft | 121 | - | 121 | 3 |
| MAR 26 | Steinebach, Chris | P-40 / Lidberg | 206 | - | 206 | 2 |
| APR 26 | Patton, John * | Napier-Heston / Lidberg | 302 | - | 302 | 1 |
| APR 26 | Bredehoft, George ** | Stuka / ? | 120 | - | 120 | 4 |
If nothing else, these 2 flights perhaps reinforce my often-said comment that NOCALs provide the very best return on a minimal investment of time and money!
| Date | Entrant's Name | Model Name / Designer | 3 Flight Total (sec.) | 4th flight (sec.) | Total Score | Place |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22 | Danjo, Akihiro / JP | Dayton-Wright RB1 / Bredehoft | 193* | - | - | 1 |
| Date | Name | Model Name / Designer | 3 Flight Total (sec.) | 4th flight (sec.) | Total Score | Place |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1APR,'98 | Longacre, Jacob | Goon / Linstrum |
160 |
160 | NA |
| Date | Entrant's Name | Model Name / Designer | 3 Flight Total (sec.) | 4th flight (sec.) | Total Score | Place |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb7,'98 Example | Fleming, John | Staggerwing Beech/ Lidberg | 419 | 169 | 588 | NA |
| Date | Entrant's Name | Model Name / Designer | 3 Flight Total (sec.) | 4th flight (sec.) | Total Score | Place |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s Example | Goddard, Robert | ?/ Goddard | 419 | 169 | 588 | NA |
NOCAL FFML Postal Contest Rules
FAC NOCAL Rulesfrom FAC = The Flying Aces Club[Note: FAC specifies 'No maximum flight time', but we have imposed max times for outdoor NOCALs as noted above. In addition, note the minimum weight rules in some categories of the Postal contest.]
NO-CAL PROFILE SCALE No, we don't have NOCAL cops who will come to inspect your plane - the honor system prevails. (Note from Bob Clemens during the first postal contest: "It's interesting to note that Rule #7 was severely ignored in the past, especially at the USIC in Johnson City. Some strutted aircraft modeled with NO struts at all. Boooo!") Sponsor's NoteSee the AALmps Catalog , with listings of NOCALs and other plans/kits plans offered. |
Postal Rules
| FAC/NOCAL Rules
| Sponsor's Note
| NOCAL Plans
| Free Flight Mail List
| Flyer's Notes
Thanks for sponsoring the postal again. Only one other person besides me flys indoor near here and he flys only sport models. Therefore the postals frequently help get me out to fly and improve. When the USIC comes to Johnson City, TN each May-June, then I have a lot more flying colleagues for 5 days.
Two weeks ago today I had double hernia surgery and by today I had regained enough energy to put up four flights at the East Tennessee State University Mini-Dome. The first flight was Federation ROG and I broke a LE dihedral joint in the rafters. My goal was 8 minutes; I once did 7:55.
The other three flights were No-Cal for the postal. Times were 5:15, 4:56, and 5:05. Since my previous personal high time was 5:05 and I had only broken 5 minutes twice before, I was overjoyed with these results. Note that these results are not competitive at the USIC, but they raise my personal standard somewhat.
The Mini-Dome was an interesting place today. Workers were putting down artificial turf for a track meet tomorrow and Saturday. A cargo door was open all the time and a forklift and a Zamboni were in use. I managed to dodge these obstacles and do not believe that I thermaled over these vehicles. The likelihood of loosing a model tends to keep me away from the vehicles ! I had gawking, questions, and expressions of good luck from those working in the Mini-Dome.
Thanks again for sponsoring the Postal.
Fred Rash
From George Bredehoft we hear:
Hi Al,
The biggest "complaint I have about the NoCal contest is the timeframe. I
have no opportunity to fly during the winter without going to (what I call)
extremes. That's why there have been no entries from Battle Creek!
Well, if you like, I can enter someone. I am working with my son and two
friends in Science Olympiad. One boy has taken to modeling very well. The
Science Olympiad plane was his first model and he wanted more, so I gave him
my HiMax NoCal plan. He built it and it flies well - too well for my back
yard. I can give you three flight times based on low power flights.
His name is Steve Powers and he is 12 or 13.
The plane is T.E.A.M. HiMax from my plans.
Flight times:
48 seconds (resulted in 1 hour in a tree!)
37 seconds
36 seconds
After the tree episode (featuring me and the plane in a maple tree), we
really limited winds to about 700 (in the 35-40 second range) to keep the
plane safe. They (the 3 junior high boys and my 4 year old) repeated many,
many flights that afternoon. I think Steve may become a modeler, at least
for a little while.
George A. Bredehoft